W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wai-evaltf@w3.org > April 2012

Re: WCAG-EM Feedback

From: Denis Boudreau <dboudreau@accessibiliteweb.com>
Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2012 09:23:59 -0400
Cc: Eval TF <public-wai-evaltf@w3.org>
Message-id: <BFF0021D-CCEB-452F-AD52-19E3481AE905@accessibiliteweb.com>
To: Vivienne CONWAY <v.conway@ecu.edu.au>
Hi folks,

Sorry to have been so silent in the past few months. I'm hoping I can come back to focussing on this work here soon enough.

Vivienne, with all due respect, I think you are being a little sensitive. Considering the fact that E.A. Draffan bought into Karl's april fools joke, I wouldn't worry about this too much. I'm pretty sure what she meant was simply that she agreed with what he was saying and that she, too, sohuld consider moving to another passion of hers... after all, it does get tiring to keep telling people the same things over and over again, while the results rarely live to the (our?) expectations. ;p

This methodology is a really good and honest attempt at providing the community with a reliable and measurable way to assess accessibility. It is not yet perfect, and quite frankly, nor will it ever be, and there will always be people out there who will feel it's not "good enough". Whether E.A. feels it's good or bad doesn't matter so much (obviously, it would be cool if she thought it was good) as it would still be one person's opinion and what we're striving for is is community endorsement. 

What truly matters is that we get as many people as possible to follow up with the methodology, so we get more and more coherence between evaluators. And so far, most people I've spoken to about this feel it's a really interesting effort. Have you had the chance of getting some feedback yourself?

What we should try and reach for however, is constructive criticism from the people who feel it's not "good enough". So I encourage all of us to go and get that feedback, whenever someone says the methodology isn't "good enough" to their liking. Because that's a great way to make it better. Not a lot of people have the drive to take part, but a lot of people have opinions. We can learn from all that. :)

Have a great week everyone.

-- 
Denis Boudreau, président
Coopérative AccessibilitéWeb 

1751 rue Richardson, bureau 6111 
Montréal (Qc), Canada H3K 1G6 
Téléphone : +1 877.315.5550 
Courriel : dboudreau@accessibiliteweb.com
Web : www.accessibiliteweb.com

"Good design is accessible design" (John Slatin, 1952-2008)




On 2012-04-02, at 8:21 AM, Vivienne CONWAY wrote:

> HI Eval TF
> 
> I was reading my updates from LinkedIn and came across this thread today.  Notice the last coment from E.A. Draffan.  Am I reading something into this that isn't there?  Doesn't sound like a glowing endorsement, or maybe I'm being sensitive?
> 
> http://www.linkedin.com/groupItem?view=&srchtype=discussedNews&gid=3420162&item=104605079&type=member&trk=eml-anet_dig-b_pd-ttl-cn&ut=25ER_7Nejv5Rc1
> 
> 
> Regards
> 
> Vivienne L. Conway, B.IT(Hons), MACS CT
> PhD Candidate & Sessional Lecturer, Edith Cowan University, Perth, W.A.
> Director, Web Key IT Pty Ltd.
> v.conway@ecu.edu.au<mailto:v.conway@ecu.edu.au>
> v.conway@webkeyit.com<mailto:v.conway@webkeyit.com>
> Mob: 0415 383 673
> 
> This email is confidential and intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this email is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please notify me immediately by return email or telephone and destroy the original message.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ________________________________
> This e-mail is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient you must not disclose or use the information contained within. If you have received it in error please return it to the sender via reply e-mail and delete any record of it from your system. The information contained within is not the opinion of Edith Cowan University in general and the University accepts no liability for the accuracy of the information provided.
> 
> CRICOS IPC 00279B
> 
> 
Received on Monday, 2 April 2012 13:24:33 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 8 March 2013 15:52:13 GMT