Re: Comment on Requirements RO3, R04, proposal to include Validity from Katie Haritos-Shea on 2011-09-29 (public-wai-evaltf@w3.org from September 2011)

From: Katie Haritos-Shea <ryladog@earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 09:19:02 -0400 (GMT-04:00)
To: RichardWarren <richard.warren@userite.com>, public-wai-evaltf@w3.org
Message-ID: <6528642.1317302342904.JavaMail.root@wamui-hunyo.atl.sa.earthlink.net>

+1

Katie

-----Original Message-----
>From: RichardWarren <richard.warren@userite.com>
>Sent: Sep 29, 2011 6:12 AM
>To: public-wai-evaltf@w3.org
>Subject: Re: Comment on Requirements RO3, R04, proposal to include Validity
>
>I am happy with R04 using "Replicable". But the statement needs an extra 
>"same" just to clarify that point. IE it should read
>
>R04: Replicable
>    Different Web accessibility evaluators using the same methods on the 
>same website(s) should get the same results.
>
>Regards
>Richard 
>
>
>


* katie *

Katie Haritos-Shea 
Section 508 Technical Policy Analyst

703-371-5545

People may forget exactly what it was that you said or did, 
but they will never forget how you made them feel.......

Received on Thursday, 29 September 2011 13:19:34 UTC