W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wai-evaltf@w3.org > September 2011

Re: EvalTF Agenda 29 September

From: Alistair Garrison <alistair.j.garrison@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 13:18:38 +0200
Message-Id: <872B3EB0-31D8-41F4-A3B9-E3B0046A2054@gmail.com>
To: Eric Velleman <evelleman@bartimeus.nl>, Eval TF <public-wai-evaltf@w3.org>
Dear Eric, All, 

Apologies, I'm not going to be able to make the telecon this afternoon.  I'll catch up on the list...

However, I would add the following comments into the discussion:

1) Suggest removing R03 entirely.  Unique interpretation should, in my mind, be a quality of each requirement (guideline) you are seeking to assess - and not a specific quality of the methodology.
2) A change to R04 - changing 'same' results to 'similar' results.

And finally, I did not understand "The methodology will be cross-tested by the Task Force and will include a reference to the test results".

Very best regards

Alistair Garrison

On 28 Sep 2011, at 21:39, Velleman, Eric wrote:

> Dear Eval TF,
> 
> The next teleconference is scheduled for Thursday 29 September 2011 at:
>  * 14:00 to 15:00 UTC
>  * 16:00 to 17:00 Central European Time
>  * 10:00 to 11:00 North American Eastern Time (ET)
>  * 07:00 to 08:00 North American Pacific Time (PT)
>  * 22:00 to 23:00 Western Australia Time
> 
> Please check the World Clock Meeting Planner to find out the precise date for your own time zone:
>  - <http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meeting.html>
> 
> The teleconference information is: (Passcode 3825 - "EVAL")
>  * +1.617.761.6200
>  * SIP / VoIP -http://www.w3.org/2006/tools/wiki/Zakim-SIP
> 
> We also use IRC to support the meeting: (http://irc.w3.org)
>  * IRC server: irc.w3.org
>  * port: 6665
>  * channel: #eval
> 
> 
> AGENDA:
> 
> #1. Welcome
> 
> #2. Requirements
> There is a new version available at:
> <http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/conformance/ED-methodology-20110924.html>
> We will discuss this version during this meeting. A lot of changes following our discussion last week and on the list. And some changes proposed by Shadi to make things more clear.
> 
> #3. Resources related to our Methodology
> It would be interesting to gather resources about Web Evaluation Methodologies. We made a good start thanks to Tim and . What to do with this information? Shadi proposes to add information to the Benchmarking Web Accessibility Metrics Wiki at: <http://www.w3.org/WAI/RD/wiki/Benchmarking_Web_Accessibility_Metrics>
> 
> #4. Any other business
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Eric
> 
Received on Thursday, 29 September 2011 11:19:18 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 8 March 2013 15:52:12 GMT