W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wai-evaltf@w3.org > September 2011

Agenda 21 September

From: Velleman, Eric <evelleman@bartimeus.nl>
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2011 20:55:19 +0000
To: "public-wai-evaltf@w3.org" <public-wai-evaltf@w3.org>
Message-ID: <3D063CE533923349B1B52F26312B0A46718BBC@s107ma.bart.local>
Dear Eval TF,

The next teleconference is scheduled for Thursday 21 September 2011 at:
  * 14:00 to 15:00 UTC
  * 16:00 to 17:00 Central European Time
  * 10:00 to 11:00 North American Eastern Time (ET)
  * 07:00 to 08:00 North American Pacific Time (PT)
  * 22:00 to 23:00 Western Australia Time

Please check the World Clock Meeting Planner to find out the precise date for your own time zone:
  - <http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meeting.html>

The teleconference information is: (Passcode 3825 - "EVAL")
  * +1.617.761.6200
  * SIP / VoIP -http://www.w3.org/2006/tools/wiki/Zakim-SIP

We also use IRC to support the meeting: (http://irc.w3.org)
  * IRC server: irc.w3.org
  * port: 6665
  * channel: #eval


#1. Welcome

#2. Discussing the requirements

Please find the requirements page at: <http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/conformance/ED-methodology-20110915.html>. During our call, we will discuss the proposals made on the mailing list and in the previous call:

<http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/conformance/ED-methodology-20110915.html>Proposed changes:

a. Replace 'Critical path analyses' by 'complete processes' (like used in WCAG 2.0)

b. In section Goals add: 'The methodology will cross-tested and will include a reference to the test results'.

c. In section Goals add: Reason why we need the Methodology (Kostas)

d. In section Goals: Do we want to add both preliminary and full evaluation? Proposal is to work on full evaluation of web pages and/or a full website.

e. In section Scope make subheading: 'coordination with other groups' and use scope also for scope of the methodology (Detlev)

f. In section Scope add: 'Members of the Task Force will monitor the work in the authoring tools accessibility guidelines (ATAG) working group: http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/ and the developing ATAG2.0 specification'.

g. Keep R03: Unique interpretation
The Methodology is uniquely interpretable to people who want to use it. It should make it clear to users what they can do if they choose a certain evaluation approach in the document.

h. Add requirement: Support for independent verification: The Methodology supports independent verification and quality control of the evaluation results.

i. Add requirement: Objectivity: no objectivity, no standardized methodology?

j. Add requirement: Validity

#3. Face to Face meeting
Who could host a meeting at CSUN or elsewhere?

#4. Any other business


Received on Wednesday, 21 September 2011 20:57:22 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:40:18 UTC