W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wai-evaltf@w3.org > September 2011


From: Velleman, Eric <evelleman@bartimeus.nl>
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2011 21:57:45 +0000
To: "public-wai-evaltf@w3.org" <public-wai-evaltf@w3.org>
Message-ID: <3D063CE533923349B1B52F26312B0A467172DB@s107ma.bart.local>
Dear all,

Thank you for the great input and discussion today. We still have to resolve a few discussions regarding 3 proposed requirements.

Please share your thoughts with the group on the list:

* R03: Unique interpretation
Explanation: The Methodology itself is uniquely interpretable to people who want to use it. It should make it clear to users what they can do if they choose a certain evaluation approach in the document.
  - Editor note: Proposal is to drop this one.

* R08: Address the needs of the target audience
Explanation: (see also the section on target audience). The Methodology is usable for the target audiences. The document will give a short description of the knowledge necessary for using the Methodology for evaluations.
  - Editor note: Proposal is to drop this one as it is already described in the earlier section target audience.

* R11: Critical path analyses
  - Editor note: Katie will look up the terminology as it is used in WCAG 2.0. We will then use that here and change the explanation to reflect WCAG 2.0. Also we could consider to drop this one as it is already described inside WCAG 2.0.

Please feel free to propose any other requirements necessary for a good Methodology.

Kindest regards,

Received on Thursday, 15 September 2011 22:02:04 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:40:18 UTC