W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wai-evaltf@w3.org > October 2011

AW: Wiki: "Website Accessibility Evaluation Methodologies" - title

From: Kerstin Probiesch <k.probiesch@googlemail.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2011 18:22:57 +0200
To: "'Shadi Abou-Zahra'" <shadi@w3.org>
Cc: <public-wai-evaltf@w3.org>
Message-ID: <4ea98561.5132df0a.5ccd.ffffc251@mx.google.com>
Hi Shadi,

I think there is no need for categorizing each listed one in method,
technique and methodology and also this could easily create a long debate.
This is not my intention. I just thought that the proposed change of the
title will be more open.

Best

Kerstin 

> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Shadi Abou-Zahra [mailto:shadi@w3.org]
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 27. Oktober 2011 18:09
> An: Kerstin Probiesch
> Cc: public-wai-evaltf@w3.org
> Betreff: Re: Wiki: "Website Accessibility Evaluation Methodologies" -
> title
> 
> Hi Kerstin,
> 
> Yes, I thought about separating them out into different pages when we
> have more entries. I'm not looking forward to categorization though...
> 
> Best,
>    Shadi
> 
> 
> On 27.10.2011 17:30, Kerstin Probiesch wrote:
> > Hi TF,
> >
> > it seems to me, that not all "methodologies" on
> >
> http://www.w3.org/WAI/RD/wiki/Website_Accessibility_Evaluation_Methodol
> ogies
> > are really "methodologies". Some are "just" techniques or methods.
> Therefore
> > a title like "Website Accessibility Evaluation methods (or
> techniques?) and
> > methodologies" might be better. Or?
> >
> >
> > Best
> >
> > Kerstin
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> 
> --
> Shadi Abou-Zahra - http://www.w3.org/People/shadi/
> Activity Lead, W3C/WAI International Program Office
> Evaluation and Repair Tools Working Group (ERT WG)
> Research and Development Working Group (RDWG)
Received on Thursday, 27 October 2011 16:23:28 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 8 March 2013 15:52:12 GMT