W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wai-evaltf@w3.org > October 2011

RE: [even more] naming for "Methodology"

From: Vivienne CONWAY <v.conway@ecu.edu.au>
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 19:30:52 +0800
To: Denis Boudreau <dboudreau@accessibiliteweb.com>, Eval TF <public-wai-evaltf@w3.org>
Message-ID: <8AFA77741B11DB47B24131F1E38227A9914FAED33C@XCHG-MS1.ads.ecu.edu.au>
Hi Denis
Actually, I really like that.  I was hesitant about a short name, but that makes good sense.


Regards

Vivienne L. Conway

________________________________
From: public-wai-evaltf-request@w3.org [public-wai-evaltf-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Denis Boudreau [dboudreau@accessibiliteweb.com]
Sent: Thursday, 20 October 2011 10:23 PM
To: Eval TF
Subject: Re: [even more] naming for "Methodology"

Hi everyone,

We just had a discussion over at EOWG and Robert Yonaitis, suggested "WCAG-EM" for "Evaluation Methodology".

Simple, effective. Thoughts?

/Denis



On 2011-10-13, at 12:13 PM, Amy Chen wrote:

Hi everyone,

Any of the full titles for the methodology sounded good to me. “Accessibility Evaluation Methodology” would work.

(I would prefer to move away from adding any additional acronyms like “AEM” though.)

For the short name, I liked WCAG-Check, but the word “check” isn’t part of the full title for the evaluation methodology.

How about “WCAG-Method” as a short name for the methodology? (I agree that WCAG-Eval sounded too much like “evil.”) We can add a sentence about referring to the short name as part of the Abstract.

Thanks,
Amy

From: Léonie Watson [mailto:lwatson@nomensa.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2011 1:01 AM
To: Vincent François; public-wai-evaltf@w3.org<mailto:public-wai-evaltf@w3.org>
Subject: RE: [even more] naming for "Methodology"

    Would "Accessibility Evaluation Methodology (AEM)" work?



Regards,
Léonie.

--
Nomensa - humanising technology

Léonie Watson, Director of Accessibility & Web Development

tel: +44 (0)117 929 7333
twitter: @we_are_Nomensa @LeonieWatson




________________________________
From: public-wai-evaltf-request@w3.org<mailto:public-wai-evaltf-request@w3.org> [mailto:public-wai-evaltf-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Vincent François
Sent: 13 October 2011 04:17
To: public-wai-evaltf@w3.org<mailto:public-wai-evaltf@w3.org>
Subject: Re: [even more] naming for "Methodology"
Le 11-10-12 17:20, Shadi Abou-Zahra a écrit :
Candidate title (alternative suggestions still welcome):
- Methodology for Evaluating Website Accessibility Conformance

Open brainstorming for shortname:
- SiteAccess
- WCAG-Check
- AccessSite
- WCAG-Site
- AccessCheck
- SiteCheck
- CheckSite
- WAMBAM
- title
OpenAccess
AccessWall
Accessiblity: stop and go
Accessiblity: open / close
EvalAccess
EWallAccess
BreachAccess
FortressAccess
...
--

Vincent François
Directeur général

Coopérative AccessibilitéWeb
1751 rue Richardson, bureau 6111
Montréal (Qc), Canada H3K 1G6

vincent.francois@accessibiliteweb.com<mailto:vincent.francois@accessibiliteweb.com>
http://www.accessibiliteweb.com<http://www.accessibiliteweb.com/>
Tél. : +1 514-312-3378
Sans frais : +1 877-315-5550


________________________________
This e-mail is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient you must not disclose or use the information contained within. If you have received it in error please return it to the sender via reply e-mail and delete any record of it from your system. The information contained within is not the opinion of Edith Cowan University in general and the University accepts no liability for the accuracy of the information provided.

CRICOS IPC 00279B
Received on Tuesday, 25 October 2011 11:32:07 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 8 March 2013 15:52:12 GMT