W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wai-evaltf@w3.org > October 2011

AW: scope of the Methodology (was Re: "website" vs "web content" vs other (was Re: Short name for Methodology))

From: Kerstin Probiesch <k.probiesch@googlemail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 17:02:12 +0200
To: "'Denis Boudreau'" <dboudreau@accessibiliteweb.com>, "'Eval TF'" <public-wai-evaltf@w3.org>
Message-ID: <4ea037f5.10350e0a.6939.65f1@mx.google.com>
Hi TF,


> > I believe we agreed that the Methodology would explain how to use
> WCAG 2.0 Techniques for evaluating web page samples rather than to
> duplicate them or to create synthesized versions of them.
> 
> +1. There's no point in competing with existing WAI documents. Let's
> just point to them. Worse comes to worst, we work with the WCAG WG if
> we feel something needs to be updated/modified.

I agree. There is no need for doing more than pointing to them. 

> There is a real need for some sort of synthesized document however, but
> this would probably be a job for EOWG, not this taskforce.
> 
> 
> > If we go down that route we risk re-interpreting WCAG or running into
> maintenance issues for chasing web technologies as they are released.
> 
> Absolutely.

Yes.

Best

Kerstin


> 
> /Denis
> 
Received on Thursday, 20 October 2011 15:02:43 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 8 March 2013 15:52:12 GMT