RE: Short name for Methodology

HI all

If we have to have a short name (and I'm still not convinced it's necessary), I'd vote for WAEM as it reflects the actual title.  I could live with WCAG-SiteCheck if we're not necessarily looking at something that is derived form the actual title.


Regards

Vivienne L. Conway
________________________________________
From: public-wai-evaltf-request@w3.org [public-wai-evaltf-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Velleman, Eric [evelleman@bartimeus.nl]
Sent: Thursday, 13 October 2011 11:11 PM
To: public-wai-evaltf@w3.org
Subject: Short name for Methodology

Dear all,

We decided in the call to discuss the short name in the list. Below are some short names from the discussions we had sofar and a proposed shortlist of requirements:

Requirements for a short name:
- It should be short
- Easy to pronounce
- Clear to all what it means (selfexplanatory)
- Be about the methodology

Shortnames (Make your choice or add new ones):
- SiteAccess
- WCAG-Method
- WCAG-EM
- WAEM (really using the title)
- WCAG-Check
- AccessSite
- WCAG-Site
- AccessCheck
- SiteCheck
- CheckSite
- WAMBAM
- WAME
- MCEWA
- CEWA
- CEW2WCAG2
- UWEM
- SITE
- MAWA
- MDWC
- EWAMAC
- EMAWC
- WEM

Kindest regards,

Eric

This e-mail is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient you must not disclose or use the information contained within. If you have received it in error please return it to the sender via reply e-mail and delete any record of it from your system. The information contained within is not the opinion of Edith Cowan University in general and the University accepts no liability for the accuracy of the information provided.

CRICOS IPC 00279B

Received on Monday, 17 October 2011 04:06:19 UTC