W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wai-evaltf@w3.org > October 2011

RE: Short name for Methodology

From: Fong, Elizabeth N. <elizabeth.fong@nist.gov>
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2011 11:15:06 -0400
To: "Velleman, Eric" <evelleman@bartimeus.nl>
CC: "public-wai-evaltf@w3.org" <public-wai-evaltf@w3.org>
Message-ID: <D7A0423E5E193F40BE6E94126930C49308E77FEA50@MBCLUSTER.xchange.nist.gov>
I like WAEM, It is really the title and it is easy to pronounce.
--Liz
-----Original Message-----
From: public-wai-evaltf-request@w3.org [mailto:public-wai-evaltf-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Velleman, Eric
Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2011 11:11 AM
To: public-wai-evaltf@w3.org
Subject: Short name for Methodology

Dear all,

We decided in the call to discuss the short name in the list. Below are some short names from the discussions we had sofar and a proposed shortlist of requirements:

Requirements for a short name:
- It should be short
- Easy to pronounce
- Clear to all what it means (selfexplanatory)
- Be about the methodology

Shortnames (Make your choice or add new ones):
- SiteAccess
- WCAG-Method
- WCAG-EM
- WAEM (really using the title)
- WCAG-Check
- AccessSite
- WCAG-Site
- AccessCheck
- SiteCheck
- CheckSite
- WAMBAM
- WAME
- MCEWA
- CEWA
- CEW2WCAG2
- UWEM
- SITE
- MAWA
- MDWC
- EWAMAC
- EMAWC
- WEM

Kindest regards,

Eric
Received on Thursday, 13 October 2011 15:15:41 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 8 March 2013 15:52:12 GMT