- From: Vincent François <vfrancois@accessibiliteweb.com>
- Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2011 22:57:24 -0400
- To: public-wai-evaltf@w3.org
Received on Thursday, 13 October 2011 02:57:47 UTC
Le 11-10-10 08:40, Kathy Wahlbin a écrit : > I like this one best: > > Methodology for Evaluating Website Accessibility Conformance (MEWAC) > > If we don't mention WCAG then we don't have to worry about 2.0 or 2.X. In > the documentation we will have information on WCAG so I don't think we need > it in the name - accessibility is better. Hi, I do think we should not mention WCAG, and especially the 2, 2.0 or whatever 2.x in our title. We will have enough room in the text itself to mention at which released of which standard it is related to. -- Vincent François Directeur général *Coopérative AccessibilitéWeb* 1751 rue Richardson, bureau 6111 Montréal (Qc), Canada H3K 1G6 vincent.francois@accessibiliteweb.com <mailto:vincent.francois@accessibiliteweb.com> http://www.accessibiliteweb.com <http://www.accessibiliteweb.com/> Tél. : +1 514-312-3378 Sans frais : +1 877-315-5550
Received on Thursday, 13 October 2011 02:57:47 UTC