W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wai-evaltf@w3.org > October 2011

Re: [more] naming for "Methodology"

From: Vincent François <vfrancois@accessibiliteweb.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2011 22:57:24 -0400
To: public-wai-evaltf@w3.org
Message-id: <4E965394.6090702@accessibiliteweb.com>
Le 11-10-10 08:40, Kathy Wahlbin a écrit :
> I like this one best:
>
> Methodology for Evaluating Website Accessibility Conformance  (MEWAC)
>
> If we don't mention WCAG then we don't have to worry about 2.0 or 2.X.  In
> the documentation we will have information on WCAG  so I don't think we need
> it in the name  - accessibility is better.
Hi,

I do think we should not mention WCAG, and especially the 2, 2.0 or 
whatever 2.x in our title.  We will have enough room in the text itself 
to mention at which released of which standard it is related to.


-- 

Vincent François
Directeur général

*Coopérative AccessibilitéWeb*
1751 rue Richardson, bureau 6111
Montréal (Qc), Canada H3K 1G6

vincent.francois@accessibiliteweb.com 
<mailto:vincent.francois@accessibiliteweb.com>
http://www.accessibiliteweb.com <http://www.accessibiliteweb.com/>
Tél. : +1 514-312-3378
Sans frais : +1 877-315-5550
Received on Thursday, 13 October 2011 02:57:47 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 8 March 2013 15:52:12 GMT