W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wai-evaltf@w3.org > October 2011

RE: naming for "Methodology"

From: Boland Jr, Frederick E. <frederick.boland@nist.gov>
Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2011 07:28:31 -0400
To: Léonie Watson <lwatson@nomensa.com>, Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>, Eval TF <public-wai-evaltf@w3.org>
Message-ID: <D7A0423E5E193F40BE6E94126930C49308E6F8E5EB@MBCLUSTER.xchange.nist.gov>
Somewhat in support as well - my only concern is the reference to WCAG2.0 - how general is it?  Do we have a specific timestamp/snapshot/version or draft of WCAG2.0 in mind for this reference?   WCAG2.0 is changing over time (new editors drafts, possible errata, new techniques/understanding/how to meet..etc - even possible new versions)?   How do we handle the issue of pointing to a possibly changing specification over time? 
Thanks and best wishes
Tim Boland NIST

________________________________________
From: public-wai-evaltf-request@w3.org [public-wai-evaltf-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Léonie Watson [lwatson@nomensa.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2011 7:17 AM
To: Shadi Abou-Zahra; Eval TF
Subject: RE: naming for "Methodology"

        "Methodology for Assessing Website Conformity to WCAG 2.0" is clear, concise and usable. Gets my vote.





Regards,
Léonie.

--
Nomensa - humanising technology

Léonie Watson, Director of Accessibility & Web Development

tel: +44 (0)117 929 7333
twitter: @we_are_Nomensa @LeonieWatson

-----Original Message-----
From: public-wai-evaltf-request@w3.org [mailto:public-wai-evaltf-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Shadi Abou-Zahra
Sent: 06 October 2011 06:18
To: Eval TF
Subject: naming for "Methodology"

Dear group,

As trivial as it may sound it is time for us to think about a name for the Methodology, so that we can start fleshing it out.

Here are some brainstorms to get your creativity flowing:


# Favorites:
  - Sampling, Inspection, and Technical Evaluation [of Websites for WCAG 2.0] (SITE) ... especially when used in combination like "WCAG 2.0 SITE"
  - Methodology for Assessing Website Conformity to WCAG 2.0 (MAC)


# Alternatives:
  - Conformance Evaluation of Websites for Accessibility (CEWA or Conf)
  - Accessibility Conformance Evaluation of Websites (ACEW)
  - Conformance/Conformity Assessment Procedure (CAP)
  - Conformance/Conformity Assessment Methodology (CAM)
  - Website Accessibility Evaluation (WAE)
  - Website Accessibility Assessment (WAA)
  - Website Accessibility Methodology (WAM)
  - Website Accessibility Assessment Procedure (WAAP)
  - Website Accessibility Assessment Methodology (WAAM)
  - Website Accessibility Evaluation Procedure (WAEP)
  - Website Accessibility Evaluation Methodology (WAEM)
  - Website Accessibility Inspection Procedure (WAIP)
  - Website Accessibility Inspection Methodology (WAIM)


# Not serious:
  - Conformance of Websites (CoW, WCAG-CoW, or WAI-CoW)
  - Accessibility Conformance of Websites (A-CoW)
  - Procedure for Accessibility Inspection (PAI like "pay")
  - Procedure for Evaluation of Accessibility (PEA)
  - Procedure for Evaluation of Accessibility Conformance (PEACe)
  - Accessibility Evaluation of Websites (AEW)
  - Harmonized Assessment Methodology (HAM)
  - WCAG 2.0 Harmonized Assessment Methodology (WHAM)
  - Website Conformance Assessment Guidelines (WCAG)


Best,
   Shadi

--
Shadi Abou-Zahra - http://www.w3.org/People/shadi/
Activity Lead, W3C/WAI International Program Office
Evaluation and Repair Tools Working Group (ERT WG)
Research and Development Working Group (RDWG)
Received on Thursday, 6 October 2011 11:29:27 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 8 March 2013 15:52:12 GMT