- From: Vivienne CONWAY <v.conway@ecu.edu.au>
- Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2011 18:24:24 +0800
- To: Alistair Garrison <alistair.j.garrison@gmail.com>, Eval TF <public-wai-evaltf@w3.org>
Hi Alistair I have to say I've never encountered one of those scripts. Can you provide an example and I'll have a try? Regards Vivienne L. Conway, B.IT(Hons) PhD Candidate & Sessional Lecturer, Edith Cowan University, Perth, W.A. Director, Web Key IT Pty Ltd. v.conway@ecu.edu.au v.conway@webkeyit.com Mob: 0415 383 673 This email is confidential and intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this email is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please notify me immediately by return email or telephone and destroy the original message. ________________________________________ From: Alistair Garrison [alistair.j.garrison@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, 21 November 2011 6:34 PM To: Eval TF Subject: Web accessibility enhancement scripts Dear All, How do we handle pages which contain (what I term) "web accessibility enhancement scripts" - scripts used to alter / augment aspects of the loaded user interface in order to try and provide a better user experience for people with disabilities usually executed by the "screen-reader users, click here to" type link e.g. the "screen-reader users, click here to turn off google instant" found at the top of Google’s search page. Should a page be assessed before "web accessibility enhancement scripts" are run, after they are run, or both? Are they even to be mentioned (section 7???) or encouraged at all? Seeking thoughts / comments... Very best regards Alistair Garrison This e-mail is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient you must not disclose or use the information contained within. If you have received it in error please return it to the sender via reply e-mail and delete any record of it from your system. The information contained within is not the opinion of Edith Cowan University in general and the University accepts no liability for the accuracy of the information provided. CRICOS IPC 00279B
Received on Monday, 21 November 2011 10:26:13 UTC