- From: Velleman, Eric <evelleman@bartimeus.nl>
- Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 23:35:37 +0000
- To: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>, Eval TF <public-wai-evaltf@w3.org>
Hi Shadi, Yes, very valuable input from the WCAG WG. As we discussed today in our call, we agree with them that the document is currently very sketchy. So lets take the the coming weeks to work on that and add more explanation and clarity before we send it in again. Thanks to all and I will start the discussion and more input tomorrow. Kindest regards, Eric ________________________________________ Van: Shadi Abou-Zahra [shadi@w3.org] Verzonden: donderdag 17 november 2011 23:09 Aan: Velleman, Eric; Eval TF Onderwerp: Comments from WCAG WG Dear Eric, Eval TF, Ref: <http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/20111117misc/results> WCAG WG provided comments on the current Methodology Editors Draft. In general there is a sentiment that it may be too early to publish the document as-is, which is in-line with what others have expressed on today's Eval TF call. I think it is useful feedback that can help us focus on how we are framing our work for public consumption. Best, Shadi -- Shadi Abou-Zahra - http://www.w3.org/People/shadi/ Activity Lead, W3C/WAI International Program Office Evaluation and Repair Tools Working Group (ERT WG) Research and Development Working Group (RDWG)
Received on Thursday, 17 November 2011 23:40:00 UTC