For our "conformance claims" section 10.4, Authoring Tools Accessibility Guidelines (ATAG) 2.0 editors' draft: http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/2011/ED-ATAG20-20111014/#conf-claim currently has some text (which is currently under discussion..) - could any of this be helpful in deciding what to include in our section of the same name? NOTE: There is also a "progress towards conformance" section: http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/2011/ED-ATAG20-20111014/#conf-prog-statement which may be applicable towards our "10.3 Partial Conformance" section? I think it's important to encourage and motivate accessibility/conformance in our documentation as appropriate.. Thanks and best wishes Tim Boland NIST PS - Of course WCAG also has "conformance claims" and "statement of partial conformance" in their "conformance" section: http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/REC-WCAG20-20081211/#conformance Do we reference all of the "WCAG supporting documents": http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/REC-WCAG20-20081211/#intro-related-docs in our specifications? -----Original Message----- From: Velleman, Eric [mailto:evelleman@bartimeus.nl] Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2011 5:24 PM To: public-wai-evaltf@w3.org Subject: WCAG-Evaluation Methodology first online version Dear all, Please find the first version of the Evaluation Methodology at: http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/conformance/ED-methodology-20111102 <http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/conformance/ED-methodology-20111102>Please note that the time in UTC in the mail with the agenda should be 15:00 to 16:00 UTC. The other times are correct. Hope to speak to you all tomorrow. Kindest regards, EricReceived on Thursday, 3 November 2011 13:22:39 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 8 March 2013 15:52:12 GMT