W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wai-evaltf@w3.org > August 2011

Input for EvalTF agendapoint 4

From: Velleman, Eric <evelleman@bartimeus.nl>
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2011 13:59:31 +0000
To: "public-wai-evaltf@w3.org" <public-wai-evaltf@w3.org>
Message-ID: <3D063CE533923349B1B52F26312B0A4670EE01@s107ma.bart.local>
Input questions for agenda point 4:

Thanks to Roberto, Shadi, all

* Is the "evaluation methodology" expected to be carried out by one person or by a group of more than one persons?

* What is the expected level of expertise (in accessibility, in web technologies etc) of persons carrying out an evaluation?

* Is the involvement of people with disabilities a necessary part of carrying out an evaluation versus an improvement of the quality?

* Are the individual test results binary (ie pass/fail) or a score (discrete value, ratio, etc)?

* How are these test results aggregated into an overall score (plain count, weighted count, heuristics, etc)?

* Is it useful to have a "confidence score" for the tests (for example depending on the degree of subjectivity or "difficulty")?

* Is it useful to have a "confidence score" for the aggregated result (depending on how the evaluation is carried out)


=========================
Eric Velleman
Technisch directeur
Stichting Accessibility
Universiteit Twente

Oudenoord 325,
3513EP Utrecht (The Netherlands);
Tel: +31 (0)30 - 2398270
www.accessibility.nl / www.wabcluster.org / www.econformance.eu /
www.game-accessibility.com/ www.eaccessplus.eu

Lees onze disclaimer: www.accessibility.nl/algemeen/disclaimer
Accessibility is Member van het W3C
=========================
Received on Thursday, 25 August 2011 14:03:00 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 8 March 2013 15:52:11 GMT