- From: Yod Samuel Martín <samuelm@dit.upm.es>
- Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2014 12:14:24 +0100
- To: "'ERT WG'" <public-wai-ert@w3.org>
- Cc: "'Shadi Abou-Zahra'" <shadi@w3.org>
Dear Group, Below you may find my comments regarding the latest draft of AERT. Previous pending comments: ------------------------------------ I have noticed a couple of comments to the previous draft <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert/2014Mar/0008.html> have not been reflected in this one. I would just like to be sure they have been consciously discarded (just in case they might have been accidentally overlooked) 2.2.2 Automatic, semiautomatic and manual testing: clarify differences between manual and semiautomatic tests 2.3 Reporting and monitoring: add mentions to reports superimposed on top of content. Content change suggestions: ------------------------------------ 2.1.1 Content types, Resources with other proprietary or open source formats Suggested change: "Embedded controls and applications" would be a more precise definition. Rationale: "Other proprietary and open source formats" is a too broad concept that would encompass formats quite far from current examples (Flash and Silverlight). Or, if the term is kept, then the examples could be adapted so as to cover a broader variety. In any case, all the other formats I come up with are already covered by either this definition (Java, ActiveX) or previous items (SVG, MathML, SMIL). 2.1.7 Authentication Suggested change: add at the end of the last paragraph "The tool may also support the use of different credential for different parts of a web site." Rationale: this was considered some time ago in the discussions (Carlos, correct me if I am wrong, imergo supported that indeed), but it has not been reflected anywhere. With the current document structure, it would naturally fit there. 2.1.9 Crawling Suggested change: change "a maximum depth level in the URL" to "a maximum recursion level in the crawling process". Rationale: when I suggested adding the filters, that was what I meant with "after a number of levels" in my previous comment, sorry if I did not explain myself. For sure, if you consider "maximum depth level in the URL" also makes sense with another meaning, I would rather clarify it than remove it. 2.4.1 Workflow integration Suggested change: Expand each of the items with definitions of the feature in that context. For instance - Plug-ins or extensions in web browsers. Tools that integrate with web browsers may delegate on it the retrieval and rendering of the evaluated web content, effectively having as test subject whichever content the evaluator is browsing at that moment. They may also present the evaluation results through the web browsers viewport. - Plug-ins for Integrated Development Environments (IDEs). Tools that integrate with IDEs extend their typical capabilities to report coding errors so as to include accessibility evaluation as well. - Plug-ins for Content Management Systems (CMS). Tools that integrate with CMSs may evaluate the templates hosted by the CMS. They may also embed accessibility evaluation within CMS editing tools. - Stand-alone tools (desktop, mobile apps, online tools). etc. Rationale: provide details to explain the implications of supporting the feature. Editorial changes: --------------------- 2.1 Test subjects and their environment, introduction to section, last paragraph) Suggested change: change "elements" to "components" in "the rendering of a web resource implies the manipulation and storage of many other elements associated with it," Rationale: Consistency with the change of terminology that has been introduced in the following sentence. 2.1.1 Content types, Other document formats Suggested change: remove "was" from "and was later on standardised by ISO" Rationale: grammatical consistency with the rest of the sentence 2.1.5 Content negotiation Suggested change: undo the addition of "or by an Uniform Resource Locator ( URL )" Rationale: it would be redundant, as a URL is a type of URI, and thus they are already covered by the reference to URIs in the same paragraph. Hear you later! Regards, Samuel. -----Mensaje original----- De: Shadi Abou-Zahra [mailto:shadi@w3.org] Enviado el: miércoles, 26 de marzo de 2014 10:04 Para: ERT WG Asunto: [for review] updated draft AERT Dear Group, The latest draft of AERT (working title) for review is here: - http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/WD-AERT/ED-AERT Please send comments for discussion to the list! Regards, Shadi -- Shadi Abou-Zahra - http://www.w3.org/People/shadi/ Activity Lead, W3C/WAI International Program Office Evaluation and Repair Tools Working Group (ERT WG) Research and Development Working Group (RDWG)
Received on Wednesday, 26 March 2014 11:15:24 UTC