- From: Yod Samuel Martín <samuelm@dit.upm.es>
- Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2013 11:47:06 +0100
- To: "'ERT WG'" <public-wai-ert@w3.org>
Dear ERT WG, Just a couple of styling comments regarding the latest editor's draft. I understand the document is mature enough to have a first public release. 1. I've noticed some modal verbs have been changed, but I cannot see a pattern. I know modal verbs are used in this document with its plain-English meaning, instead of the sense defined by RFC 2119 (the capitalized, standard-meaning versions such as MUST, SHOULD, MAY, etc.) Nonetheless, I understand there is a rationale behind using "can", "could", "may", or "should", however I am not sure if it is consistently followed throughout the document. 2. Most of the document uses an active tone, directly addressing the reader, using a second-person style. However, there are also several sentences that use passive constructions (e.g. "feature X must be declared by the tool" instead of "your tool must declare feature X"). Regards, Samuel. -----Mensaje original----- De: Shadi Abou-Zahra [mailto:shadi@w3.org] Enviado el: lunes, 02 de diciembre de 2013 17:25 Para: ERT WG Asunto: [for review] updated draft AERT Dear Group, The latest draft of AERT (working title) for review is here: - http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/WD-AERT/ED-AERT Please send comments for discussion to the list! Regards, Shadi -- Shadi Abou-Zahra - http://www.w3.org/People/shadi/ Activity Lead, W3C/WAI International Program Office Evaluation and Repair Tools Working Group (ERT WG) Research and Development Working Group (RDWG)
Received on Tuesday, 3 December 2013 11:46:20 UTC