W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wai-ert@w3.org > October 2011

ACTION-132: Review xUnit

From: Carlos A Velasco <carlos.velasco@fit.fraunhofer.de>
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 13:52:06 +0200
Message-ID: <4E92DC66.9050703@fit.fraunhofer.de>
To: ERT WG <public-wai-ert@w3.org>
Dear all,

In regard to my action item:

   <http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/tracker/actions/132>

I have reviewed the format, which can be also serialized in XML. In 
principle, it is oriented to unit testing frameworks in different 
programming languages.

There is some concept overlapping with EARL (i.e., testcase), and I 
could only find an unofficial DTD here <http://pastebin.com/gxw9PnZi>. 
In any case, I don't find it relevant, since there is no semantic web 
equivalent.

On the contrary, I see unit testing frameworks as potential users of 
EARL as export format.

-- 
Best Regards,
carlos

Dr Carlos A Velasco
   Fraunhofer Institute for Applied Information Technology FIT
   Web Compliance Center: http://webcc.fit.fraunhofer.de/
   imergoŽ: http://imergo.com/ ˇ http://imergo.de/
   Schloss Birlinghoven, D53757 Sankt Augustin (Germany)
   Tel: +49-2241-142609 ˇ Fax: +49-2241-1442609
Received on Monday, 10 October 2011 11:52:50 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 10 October 2011 11:52:51 GMT