- From: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 04 May 2011 00:07:10 +0200
- To: Philip Ackermann <philip.ackermann@fit.fraunhofer.de>
- CC: public-wai-ert@w3.org
Hi Philip, Why update the namespace if the RDF did not change? Best, Shadi On 3.5.2011 20:31, Philip Ackermann wrote: > Hi Shadi, > > approval with suggested changes: > > 1.2. Document conventions > -Update pointer namespace to 2011 (also necessary in [1] in section 1.1. > Namespaces) > > [1] http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/Pointers/WD-Pointers-in-RDF10-20110427 > > regards, > Philip > > Am 28.04.2011 12:16, schrieb Shadi Abou-Zahra: >> Dear Group, >> >> The 27 April 2011 Editors Draft of EARL 1.0 Schema is ready for review >> and approval for publication as Last Call Working Draft: >> - <http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/EARL10/WD-EARL10-Schema-20110427> >> - <http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/EARL10/schema.rdf> >> - <http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/EARL10/issues> >> >> Please indicate one of the following by *Wednesday 4 May 2011*: >> - approval for publication as-is; >> - approval for publication with suggested changes (please provide); >> - approval for publication only with changes made (please provide); >> - objection to publication due to concerns (please provide); >> - abstain from voting. >> >> Regards, >> Shadi >> > > -- Shadi Abou-Zahra - http://www.w3.org/People/shadi/ | WAI International Program Office Activity Lead | W3C Evaluation & Repair Tools Working Group Chair |
Received on Tuesday, 3 May 2011 22:07:32 UTC