Re: [for review] Representing Content in RDF 1.0, 2 May 2011 Editors Draft

Hi Carlos,

On 2.5.2011 13:41, Carlos A Velasco wrote:
> hi Shadi,
>
> I give my approval for publication as-is.

I hope so! ;)


> Should not provide the URL of the rdf schema as content.rdfs ?

Both .rdf and .rdfs return the same content but you may be right.


Best,
   Shadi

> On 02/05/11 11:52, Shadi Abou-Zahra wrote:
>> Dear Group,
>>
>> The 2 May 2011 Editors Draft of Representing Content in RDF 1.0 is ready
>> for review and approval for publication as a Working Draft:
>> - <http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/Content/WD-Content-in-RDF10-20110502>
>> - <http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/Content/content.rdf>
>> - <http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/Content/issues>
>>
>> Please indicate one of the following by *Wednesday 4 May 2011*:
>> - approval for publication as-is;
>> - approval for publication with suggested changes (please provide);
>> - approval for publication only with changes made (please provide);
>> - objection to publication due to concerns (please provide);
>> - abstain from voting.
>>
>> ...
>

-- 
Shadi Abou-Zahra - http://www.w3.org/People/shadi/ |
   WAI International Program Office Activity Lead   |
  W3C Evaluation & Repair Tools Working Group Chair |

Received on Monday, 2 May 2011 11:46:32 UTC