W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wai-ert@w3.org > April 2011

RE: [HTTP-in-RDF] absolutePath rather than abs_path

From: Emmanuelle Gutiérrez y Restrepo <emmanuelle@sidar.org>
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2011 00:31:28 +0200
To: "'Shadi Abou-Zahra'" <shadi@w3.org>, "'ERT WG'" <public-wai-ert@w3.org>
Message-ID: <016901cbfee1$87aefd00$970cf700$@sidar.org>
+1 to the Jonathan Rees comment.

Regards,
Emmanuelle

-----Mensaje original-----
De: public-wai-ert-request@w3.org [mailto:public-wai-ert-request@w3.org] En
nombre de Shadi Abou-Zahra
Enviado el: miércoles, 20 de abril de 2011 0:13
Para: ERT WG
Asunto: [HTTP-in-RDF] absolutePath rather than abs_path

Dear ERT WG,

Please find below a description of the "abs_path issue" [1]. Feel free to
comment in advance of the meeting.

[1] <http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/WD-HTTP-in-RDF10-20091029/#abs_pathProperty>


Original comment by Jonathan Rees:
  -
<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-earl10-comments/2009Dec/0004.htm
l>


Essence of the comment:
  - RDF properties are usually named using "camelCase" notation but this 
property uses a different format [because it re-uses the actually HTTP 
naming, rather than RDF naming]


Proposed resolution:
  - change "abs_path" property name to "absolutePath", to match RDF 
naming (and to be in-line with the remaining properties and classes)


Thoughts?


Regards,
   Shadi

-- 
Shadi Abou-Zahra - http://www.w3.org/People/shadi/ |
   WAI International Program Office Activity Lead   |
  W3C Evaluation & Repair Tools Working Group Chair |
Received on Tuesday, 19 April 2011 22:32:15 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 19 April 2011 22:32:16 GMT