W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wai-ert@w3.org > April 2011

For review by Friday 8 April 2011

From: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2011 16:12:36 +0200
Message-ID: <4D9C74D4.20207@w3.org>
To: ERT WG <public-wai-ert@w3.org>
ERT WG,

Please review and respond to the following points by Friday 8 April:


#1. Separating conformance/restrictions for vocabulary definitions

  - previous discussions:
  -- <http://www.w3.org/2011/03/23-er-minutes#item04>
  -- <http://www.w3.org/2011/04/06-er-minutes#item02>

  - more detailed explanation:
  -- <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert/2011Mar/0007>

  - questions to consider:
  -- can you live with conformance/restrictions moving out of the 
vocabulary definition documents, and into a more specific document?
  -- if so, what other guidance would go along with this guidance on 
conformance/restrictions for EARL tool developers?
  -- is it imaginable that the focus (and title, if needed) of the EARL 
Guide could shift to match the guidance we want to provide?

References:
  - <http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/EARL10/issues#conformance>
  - <http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/WD-EARL10-Schema-20091029/#conformance>
  - <http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/HTTP/issues#conformance>
  - <http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/WD-HTTP-in-RDF10-20091029/#conformance>


#2. HTTP-in-RDF Message Header

  - previous discussion:
  -- <http://www.w3.org/2011/03/23-er-minutes#item05>

  - proposed solution:
  -- <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert/2011Mar/0008>

  - question to consider: do you accept the proposed solution?

References:
  - <http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/HTTP/issues#MessageClass>
  - <http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/WD-HTTP-in-RDF10-20091029/#MessageClass>


#3. HTTP-in-RDF PATCH Method

  - previous discussion:
  -- <http://www.w3.org/2011/03/23-er-minutes#item05>

  - proposed solution:
  -- <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert/2011Apr/0001>

  - question to consider: do you accept the proposed solution?

References:
  - <http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/HTTP/issues#MethodClass>
  - <http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/WD-HTTP-in-RDF10-20091029/#MethodClass>


#4. Proposed batch-resolutions

  - suggestions for resolutions to open comments:
  -- <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert/2011Mar/0010>

  - note: item #5 dct:identifier/status code will be handled separately

  - question to consider: do you accept the proposed solution?



Regards,
   Shadi

-- 
Shadi Abou-Zahra - http://www.w3.org/People/shadi/ |
   WAI International Program Office Activity Lead   |
  W3C Evaluation & Repair Tools Working Group Chair |
Received on Wednesday, 6 April 2011 14:13:02 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 6 April 2011 14:15:10 GMT