Hi Carlos, Carlos Iglesias wrote: > Here you have an updated draft of the Pointer Methods in RDF document and the schema. According to the WG resolutions, changes since the previous version are: > > - Changes in the status section to reflect the new situation > - A paragraph has been added to the introduction section giving advice about Pointers usage > - All examples with abstract and generic classes have been removed > - XMLNamespace has been renamed as NamespaceMapping. There is also an Editor's note looking for feedback on the new name > - Changes to the example 10 title trying to clarify it > - Several typos has been fixed Thank you for providing this draft for review. > By the way, do you think it is necessary to add a "changes since the last version" section with this information? The W3C Process document says we *should* indicate the changes: - <http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Process/tr.html#first-wd> Since you've already got these handy, would it be easy to just add it in a small sub-section at the bottom of the document? Thanks, Shadi -- Shadi Abou-Zahra - http://www.w3.org/People/shadi/ | WAI International Program Office Activity Lead | W3C Evaluation & Repair Tools Working Group Chair |Received on Tuesday, 19 May 2009 20:56:51 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 19 May 2009 20:56:52 GMT