W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wai-ert@w3.org > June 2009

Re: proposal for versioning

From: Johannes Koch <johannes.koch@fit.fraunhofer.de>
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 12:19:28 +0200
Message-ID: <4A41FDB0.5060907@fit.fraunhofer.de>
To: ERT WG <public-wai-ert@w3.org>
Shadi Abou-Zahra schrieb:
> Dear group,
> 
> Ref: <http://www.w3.org/2005/05/tr-versions>
> 
> Please find above some background on versioning practices at W3C. The 
> issue is not determining major/minor version numbers for EARL but that 
> there are cross-dependencies between different Technical Report (TR) 
> documents. If we try to define EARL centrally in single place then we 
> may simplify these relationships. Here is a suggestion:
> 
> # "EARL 1.0" consists of these parts:
> - EARL 1.0 Schema, Recommendation of Day/Month/Year
> - EARL 1.0 Guide, WG Note of Day/Month/Year
> - HTTP-in-RDF, WG Note of Day/Month/Year
> - Content-in-RDF, WG Note of Day/Month/Year
> - Pointers-in-RDF, WG Note of Day/Month/Year
> 
> This definition for EARL 1.0 is to be recorded in the conformance 
> section of EARL 1.0 Schema, which is the core definition for EARL.

ACK!

-- 
Johannes Koch
Fraunhofer Institute for Applied Information Technology FIT
Web Compliance Center
Schloss Birlinghoven, D-53757 Sankt Augustin, Germany
Phone: +49-2241-142628    Fax: +49-2241-142065
Received on Wednesday, 24 June 2009 10:20:09 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 24 June 2009 10:20:09 GMT