- From: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2009 13:58:31 +0200
- To: Johannes Koch <johannes.koch@fit.fraunhofer.de>
- CC: ERT WG <public-wai-ert@w3.org>
Hi Johannes, Johannes Koch wrote: > Hi group, > > in EARL we defined the outcome values as sub-classes of > earl:OutcomeValue, and the test modes as sub-classes of earl:TestMode. > > Should we use the same approach for the methods and status codes in > HTTP-in-RDF? I believe this would be in-line with the comments from AWWSW: - <http://esw.w3.org/topic/AwwswHttpVocabularyInRdfComments> If so, then maybe this is indeed the better way to go... Regards, Shadi -- Shadi Abou-Zahra - http://www.w3.org/People/shadi/ | WAI International Program Office Activity Lead | W3C Evaluation & Repair Tools Working Group Chair |
Received on Wednesday, 1 April 2009 11:59:06 UTC