Re: "Representing Content in RDF" new draft

Hi Johannes,

Ref: <http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/Content/WD-Content-in-RDF-20080327>

The document looks really good but I think the abstract and introduction 
sections are too brief. These sections should describe what is inside 
the document, in a way that could be understood without having to read 
the whole document. *grin*

Also, I think it would be very important to highlight the relationship 
to HTTP-in-RDF and possibly also EARL. It may be worth considering to 
move what is currently in section 1.3 directly into the introduction 
(section 1). Not sure though, you'll need to play around a bit to see 
what works best editorially.

Do others have similar reactions?

Regards,
   Shadi

-- 
Shadi Abou-Zahra - http://www.w3.org/People/shadi/ |
   WAI International Program Office Activity Lead   |
  W3C Evaluation & Repair Tools Working Group Chair |

Received on Tuesday, 27 May 2008 03:06:15 UTC