RE: WCAG 2 comments follow-up

> > Seriously, this does not directly relate to evaluation and
evaluation
> > methods so not really within the scope of this WG.
> 
> ACK. I think we should concentrate on the things on our list (EARL,
> Pointers, HTTP-in-RDF, Content-in-RDF). If these are "finished", we
can
> review whatever we want :-)

OK, OK, got it. :oD

Regards,
 CI.

Received on Tuesday, 18 March 2008 14:49:15 UTC