W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wai-ert@w3.org > February 2008

RE: Comments and thoughts about WCAG 2.0

From: Carlos Iglesias <carlos.iglesias@fundacionctic.org>
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 18:20:14 +0100
Message-ID: <09700B613C4DD84FA9F2FEA52188281902F9BBD8@ayalga.fundacionctic.org>
To: "Johannes Koch" <johannes.koch@fit.fraunhofer.de>, <public-wai-ert@w3.org>

Hi Johannes,

> Seeing the definition of "Web page" in the glossary
> (<http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/#webpagedef>: "obtained from a single
> URI") I wonder if we need a way do describe the current state of a
> frameset (which resource is loaded into which frame) and store it in RDF.

Not sure, for me it looks more like an aggregation of resources thing that an EARL one. I mean, apparently it fits better on the POWDER side than the EARL one.

If I remember correctly we decided to focus on recording results about URIs and leave the description of relationships between different URIs to the POWDER guys, is there any reason to act in a different way with this case? 



Carlos Iglesias

Fundación CTIC
Parque Científico-Tecnológico de Gijón
33203 - Gijón, Asturias, España

teléfono: +34 984291212
fax: +34 984390612
email: carlos.iglesias@fundacionctic.org
URL: http://www.fundacionctic.org
Received on Monday, 25 February 2008 17:19:47 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:55:56 UTC