W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wai-ert@w3.org > December 2008

Reminder: [updated] EARL 1.0 Schema]

From: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2008 17:20:14 +0100
Message-ID: <4938033E.1080209@w3.org>
To: ERT WG <public-wai-ert@w3.org>

Dear ERT WG,

Please find several questions and topics for discussion on the current 
EARL 1.0 Schema draft. Please send your thoughts to the list to save 
discussion time during the calls.

Best,
   Shadi


-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [updated] EARL 1.0 Schema
Resent-Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 18:29:54 +0000
Resent-From: public-wai-ert@w3.org
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 19:29:17 +0100
From: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>
To: ERT WG <public-wai-ert@w3.org>


Hi,

Ref: <http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/EARL10/WD-EARL10-Schema-20081106>

Updated editor's draft of EARL 1.0 Schema is available for review. We
will be discussing this during this week's telecon call. Please note the
following questions (also marked as editor's notes inline):


## Editorial questions ##
- Move section 1.1 as lead-in for section 2?
- Format of "related properties" in section 2.1 vs section 2.2
- Inline conformance sub-sections (see section 2.1 vs section 2.2)
- Usage of "external link" icons, see section 2.2 for example


## Substance questions ##
- Adopt foaf:Document as TestSubject? (see section 2.3)
- Add dc:title to http:Connection and repr:Content? (see section 2.3)
- Add dc:date to TestResult? (see section 2.5)
- Definition of TestMode (see discussion on definition of Outcome)
- Class name Outcome versus OutcomeValue? (see section 2.7)
- Add dc:date to Software class? (see section 2.8)
- Check definition of mainAssertor (see section 3.6)


## Specific questions ##
- Definition of Outcome: as classes or as resources? See list discussion
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert/2008Nov/0023
- Adoption of DOAP: should we adopt it? If yes, how (using property,
using an equivalent class approach like FOAF, adopt new terms, ...)
- Conformance section: what should be in this section versus what should
be in-line within the sections. Should we (re-)use tables?


Regards,
   Shadi

-- 
Shadi Abou-Zahra - http://www.w3.org/People/shadi/ |
   WAI International Program Office Activity Lead   |
  W3C Evaluation & Repair Tools Working Group Chair |



-- 
Shadi Abou-Zahra - http://www.w3.org/People/shadi/ |
   WAI International Program Office Activity Lead   |
  W3C Evaluation & Repair Tools Working Group Chair |
Received on Thursday, 4 December 2008 16:20:57 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 4 December 2008 16:20:57 GMT