Re: dropping earl:Content in favor of http:Content

Hi Shadi,

Shadi Abou-Zahra wrote:
> Hi Carlos,
> 
> ...
> 
> If a "Content" class is created in a new namespace and described in a
> different document (i.e. it is independent of HTTP but an abstract
> description of content), do you then still think we need earl:Content?

Nope! earl:Content must be replaced by this new Class and/or its
subclasses. Also HTTP-in-RDF shall use it ...

regards,
carlos

-- 
Dr Carlos A Velasco
  Fraunhofer Institute for Applied Information Technology (FIT)
  BIKA Web Compliance Center - http://access.fit.fraunhofer.de/
  Schloss Birlinghoven, D53757 Sankt Augustin (Germany)
  Tel: +49-2241-142609 Fax: +49-2241-1442609

Received on Wednesday, 5 September 2007 10:52:47 UTC