W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wai-ert@w3.org > May 2007

Issue #20 -assume rejected unless noted otherwise

From: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 18:54:09 +0200
Message-ID: <465DAC31.4020409@w3.org>
To: public-wai-ert@w3.org

Hi,

Ref: <http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/EARL10/issues>

During today's teleconference call we talked about issues #21 and #22, 
which related to incorporating more semantics to support "evidence" 
(justify the reason for the test results). We decided to reject these 
suggestions as they are out of scope for EARL 1.0, and we agreed to 
better clarify the scope of the document (as per issue #29).

However, it seems we forgot to discuss issue #20 which is essentially 
part of the general proposal by Shuaib Karim. Unless I hear otherwise, 
issue #20 will also be labeled as rejected in the issues list. For more 
background, please find the minutes of today's call:
  - <http://www.w3.org/2007/05/30-er-minutes#item02>

Regards,
   Shadi


-- 
Shadi Abou-Zahra     Web Accessibility Specialist for Europe |
Chair & Staff Contact for the Evaluation and Repair Tools WG |
World Wide Web Consortium (W3C)           http://www.w3.org/ |
Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI),   http://www.w3.org/WAI/ |
WAI-TIES Project,                http://www.w3.org/WAI/TIES/ |
Evaluation and Repair Tools WG,    http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/ |
2004, Route des Lucioles - 06560,  Sophia-Antipolis - France |
Voice: +33(0)4 92 38 50 64          Fax: +33(0)4 92 38 78 22 |
Received on Wednesday, 30 May 2007 16:54:10 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:18:28 GMT