- From: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 03 May 2007 08:31:32 +0200
- To: public-wai-ert@w3.org
Hi,
Ref: <http://esw.w3.org/topic/SemanticWebTools>
The SemWeb folks have a collection of some of the tools in a wiki. I've
been playing around with some of the OWL checkers [1] and found at least
one bug in the schema:
<rdfs:Class rdf:about="http://www.w3.org/ns/earl#SingleAssertor">
<rdfs:label xml:lang="en">Single Assertor</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:comment xml:lang="en">One person or evaluation tool that claims
assertions</rdfs:comment>
<owl:oneOf rdf:parseType="Collection">
<owl:Thing rdf:type="http://www.w3.org/ns/earl#Software"/>
<owl:Thing rdf:type="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/Agent"/>
</owl:oneOf>
</rdfs:Class>
Should read:
<rdfs:Class rdf:about="http://www.w3.org/ns/earl#SingleAssertor">
<rdfs:label xml:lang="en">Single Assertor</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:comment xml:lang="en">One person or evaluation tool that claims
assertions</rdfs:comment>
<owl:oneOf rdf:parseType="Collection">
<owl:Thing rdf:about="http://www.w3.org/ns/earl#Software"/>
<owl:Thing rdf:about="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/Agent"/>
</owl:oneOf>
</rdfs:Class>
...in other words rdf:about instead of rdf:type for the oneOf construct.
It also seems that the cardinality restrictions are implicitly creating
a parent (anonymous) class because of the <rdfs:subclassOf> construct.
Let me know if you have other observations or findings...
[1]
<http://esw.w3.org/topic/SemanticWebTools#head-c5457b113c9ff892f0dfa7fe9e8ea7a19f36de49>
Regards,
Shadi
--
Shadi Abou-Zahra Web Accessibility Specialist for Europe |
Chair & Staff Contact for the Evaluation and Repair Tools WG |
World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) http://www.w3.org/ |
Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI), http://www.w3.org/WAI/ |
WAI-TIES Project, http://www.w3.org/WAI/TIES/ |
Evaluation and Repair Tools WG, http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/ |
2004, Route des Lucioles - 06560, Sophia-Antipolis - France |
Voice: +33(0)4 92 38 50 64 Fax: +33(0)4 92 38 78 22 |
Received on Thursday, 3 May 2007 06:31:31 UTC