W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wai-ert@w3.org > March 2007

Re: HTTP Vocabulary in RDF: extensibilty

From: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>
Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2007 17:55:53 +0100
Message-ID: <46055819.6050400@w3.org>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Cc: public-wai-ert@w3.org

Hi,

Julian Reschke wrote:
> Understood, but why are RFC2518 headers predefined, while RFC2518 status 
> codes are not? So this is a consistency question. (Note that the is an 
> IANA HTTP status code registry).

Thanks for clarifying, we will look into this.

Regards,
   Shadi


-- 
Shadi Abou-Zahra     Web Accessibility Specialist for Europe |
Chair & Staff Contact for the Evaluation and Repair Tools WG |
World Wide Web Consortium (W3C)           http://www.w3.org/ |
Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI),   http://www.w3.org/WAI/ |
WAI-TIES Project,                http://www.w3.org/WAI/TIES/ |
Evaluation and Repair Tools WG,    http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/ |
2004, Route des Lucioles - 06560,  Sophia-Antipolis - France |
Voice: +33(0)4 92 38 50 64          Fax: +33(0)4 92 38 78 22 |
Received on Saturday, 24 March 2007 16:55:53 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:18:28 GMT