W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wai-ert@w3.org > March 2007

Re: Summary of comments on HTTP-in-RDF

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2007 09:38:49 +0000
Message-ID: <4604F199.5080402@gmx.de>
To: public-wai-ert@w3.org
Cc: johannes.koch@fit.fraunhofer.de 




Hi,

re: <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert/2007Mar/0081.html>:

 >>>> I don't think we need a literal representation of the unprocessed
 >>>> headers, if the processed representation of the headers is
 >>>> equivalent to the unprocessed stuff.
 >>>
 >>> Equivalent is in the eye of the beholder. I *may* be interested that
 >>> my server send "aCCept-language" instead of "Accept-language". It
 >>> would be optional anyway...
 >>
 >> Although both header names _are_ equivalent in HTTP terms, there may
 >> be a usecase :-)
 >
 > 1 down, 2 more to go... ;)

HTTP headers are *not* case-sensitive, see 
<http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/rfc2616.html#rfc.section.4.2.p.1>.

Best regards, Julian
Received on Saturday, 24 March 2007 15:04:56 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:18:28 GMT