- From: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 22:29:06 +0100
- To: Alan Dean <alan.dean@gmail.com>
- Cc: public-wai-ert@w3.org
Hi Alan, Alan Dean wrote: > I guess my first question is: "is it ok to use the http namespace in > this manner?" Not sure what you are trying to do but it doesn't look right. For example, the code suggests that a rights:Grant is the http:GetRequest (as opposed to an instance of it). I guess you need something like: ... <rights:Grant rdf:resource="#requestInstance" /> ... <http:GetRequest rdf:ID="requestInstance"> ... </http:GetRequest> In other words, you need to create an instance of the "GetRequest" class then use it. > My next question is: "I can use the uri:uri property to represent an > absolute URI - what should I use to represent a relative URI or a > wildcard?" Note that we are dropping the uri:uri property. Our latest internal *editor's draft* provides support for absolute URI, relative URI, and wildcards. See the latest draft: - <http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/HTTP/WD-HTTP-in-RDF-20070301> Regards, Shadi -- Shadi Abou-Zahra Web Accessibility Specialist for Europe | Chair & Staff Contact for the Evaluation and Repair Tools WG | World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) http://www.w3.org/ | Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI), http://www.w3.org/WAI/ | WAI-TIES Project, http://www.w3.org/WAI/TIES/ | Evaluation and Repair Tools WG, http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/ | 2004, Route des Lucioles - 06560, Sophia-Antipolis - France | Voice: +33(0)4 92 38 50 64 Fax: +33(0)4 92 38 78 22 |
Received on Monday, 19 March 2007 21:29:34 UTC