Re: Editor's draft comments

Shadi Abou-Zahra schrieb:
> Carlos Iglesias wrote:
>> * 2.3 Test Subject
[...]
> Firstly, I think the date property in the Test Subject class must be 
> used to describe the test subject itself. In other words, it should not 
> be used to describe the testing date. If we need a "testing date" then 
> we should either put it directly in the Test Result class (recommended) 
> as part of the description of the result, or in the Assertion class.

I prefer having a date in earl:TestResult.

>> * 2.4 Test Criterion
>>
>> In order to benefit interoperability, shouldn't we add a note to 
>> encourage people to use the "common accepted references" for test 
>> criteria when they're avalaible? (e.g WCAG URIs)
> 
> I agree. Any objections?

No

-- 
Johannes Koch
BIKA Web Compliance Center - Fraunhofer FIT
Schloss Birlinghoven, D-53757 Sankt Augustin, Germany
Phone: +49-2241-142628    Fax: +49-2241-142065

Received on Tuesday, 13 March 2007 16:05:53 UTC