W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wai-ert@w3.org > June 2007

Re: About comment #2

From: Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2007 19:48:55 +0200
To: "Jon Ribbens" <ertwg@sitemorse.com>, public-wai-ert@w3.org
Message-ID: <op.tub3rtbtwxe0ny@widsith.local>

On Fri, 22 Jun 2007 13:59:07 +0200, Jon Ribbens <ertwg@sitemorse.com>  
wrote:

> On Fri, Jun 22, 2007 at 12:52:46AM +0200, Shadi Abou-Zahra wrote:
>> Still, one of the questions by Johannes was whether POST-based
>> applications can be tested for mobileOK. Unless there are objections we
>> should send this as a comment (in addition to the typo).
>
> I get the impression that MobileOK is supposed to be able to be run
> against a site without site-specific configuration or user
> interaction. That negates the possibility of doing anything useful
> with POST forms. I suspect that that sort of thing is what the
> "mobileOK Pro" tests are about (among other things).

yup.

cheers

-- 
   Charles McCathieNevile, Opera Software: Standards Group
   hablo español  -  je parle français  -  jeg lærer norsk
chaals@opera.com    Catch up: Speed Dial   http://opera.com
Received on Friday, 22 June 2007 17:49:30 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:18:28 GMT