W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wai-ert@w3.org > June 2007

Re: MobileOK review

From: Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 16:14:28 +0200
To: johannes.koch@fit.fraunhofer.de, public-wai-ert@w3.org
Message-ID: <op.ttw0iey3wxe0ny@widsith.lan>

On Thu, 14 Jun 2007 15:19:25 +0200, <johannes.koch@fit.fraunhofer.de>  

> Carlos Iglesias schrieb:
>>> 3 mobileOK Basic Tests
> [...]
>> Ideally, tests should provide messages for every fail or warning if we
>> want them to be useful for tracking reasons. The problem I find here is
>> that it looks like they have defined PASSES and FAILS as "final states"
>> that interrupt the algorithm. Note that otherwise all the algorithms  
>> will
>> always produce a PASS, as it's always the last instruction.
> What is the subject of the test? Is it the whole document (If the  
> document contains...)? Is it one element (For each element...)?

Te whiole document.

> [...]
>> My understanding is that allowed properties and values are those which  
>> are included in the CSS1 grammar.
> The CSS _grammar_ does not define allowed properties and values. The
> _vocabulary_ in the specification does.

Basically it is CSS 1 plus the media type construct from CSS 2.



   Charles McCathieNevile, Opera Software: Standards Group
   hablo español  -  je parle français  -  jeg lærer norsk
chaals@opera.com    Catch up: Speed Dial   http://opera.com
Received on Thursday, 14 June 2007 14:14:36 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:55:55 UTC