W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wai-ert@w3.org > February 2007

Re: stability of foaf:Organization

From: Phil Archer <parcher@icra.org>
Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2007 19:36:11 +0000
Message-ID: <45E1E52E.2010609@icra.org>
To: Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>
Cc: foaf-dev@lists.foaf-project.org, WAI ERT group <public-wai-ert@w3.org>, Kjetil Kjernsmo <kjetilk@opera.com>

Yes, I believe it is stable. It's a subclass of foaf:Agent which is 
itself stable. Unless I hear screams to the contrary, I think 
foaf:Organization will appear in the POWDER recs [1].



[1] http://www.w3.org/2007/powder/

Charles McCathieNevile wrote:
> Hi,
> it seems that foaf:Organization is actually pretty stable. It has been around a long time, and we would like to recommend it (and foaf:Agent and foaf:Person) as a preferred term in EARL [1]. But it would be easier if it were formally marked as stable...
> any chance?
> cheers
> Chaals
Received on Monday, 26 February 2007 07:52:08 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:55:55 UTC