Re: stability of foaf:Organization

Yes, I believe it is stable. It's a subclass of foaf:Agent which is 
itself stable. Unless I hear screams to the contrary, I think 
foaf:Organization will appear in the POWDER recs [1].

Cheers

Phil.

[1] http://www.w3.org/2007/powder/


Charles McCathieNevile wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> it seems that foaf:Organization is actually pretty stable. It has been around a long time, and we would like to recommend it (and foaf:Agent and foaf:Person) as a preferred term in EARL [1]. But it would be easier if it were formally marked as stable...
> 
> any chance?
> 
> cheers
> 
> Chaals
> 

Received on Monday, 26 February 2007 07:52:08 UTC