W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wai-ert@w3.org > February 2007

RE: stability of foaf:Organization

From: Paul Walsh, Segala <paulwalsh@segala.com>
Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2007 22:13:29 -0000
To: "'Charles McCathieNevile'" <chaals@opera.com>, <foaf-dev@lists.foaf-project.org>
Cc: "'Phil Archer'" <parcher@icra.org>, "'WAI ERT group'" <public-wai-ert@w3.org>
Message-Id: <20070225221328.D31BD1FD7A26A@postie1.hosting365.ie>

[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/EARL10-Schema/

Would like it for Content Labels (POWDER) [2] too.

[2] http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/wcl/XGR-wcl-20070220/

Cheers
Paul

> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-wai-ert-request@w3.org [mailto:public-wai-ert-request@w3.org]
On
> Behalf Of Charles McCathieNevile
> Sent: 25 February 2007 12:53
> To: foaf-dev@lists.foaf-project.org
> Cc: Phil Archer; WAI ERT group
> Subject: stability of foaf:Organization
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> it seems that foaf:Organization is actually pretty stable. It has been
around a long
> time, and we would like to recommend it (and foaf:Agent and foaf:Person)
as a
> preferred term in EARL [1]. But it would be easier if it were formally
marked as stable...
> 
> any chance?
> 
> cheers
> 
> Chaals
> 
> --
>   Charles McCathieNevile, Opera Software: Standards Group
>   hablo espa˝ol  -  je parle franšais  -  jeg lŠrer norsk
> chaals@opera.com          Try Opera 9.1     http://opera.com
Received on Sunday, 25 February 2007 22:13:38 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:18:28 GMT