- From: Paul Walsh, Segala <paulwalsh@segala.com>
- Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2007 22:13:29 -0000
- To: "'Charles McCathieNevile'" <chaals@opera.com>, <foaf-dev@lists.foaf-project.org>
- Cc: "'Phil Archer'" <parcher@icra.org>, "'WAI ERT group'" <public-wai-ert@w3.org>
[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/EARL10-Schema/ Would like it for Content Labels (POWDER) [2] too. [2] http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/wcl/XGR-wcl-20070220/ Cheers Paul > -----Original Message----- > From: public-wai-ert-request@w3.org [mailto:public-wai-ert-request@w3.org] On > Behalf Of Charles McCathieNevile > Sent: 25 February 2007 12:53 > To: foaf-dev@lists.foaf-project.org > Cc: Phil Archer; WAI ERT group > Subject: stability of foaf:Organization > > > Hi, > > it seems that foaf:Organization is actually pretty stable. It has been around a long > time, and we would like to recommend it (and foaf:Agent and foaf:Person) as a > preferred term in EARL [1]. But it would be easier if it were formally marked as stable... > > any chance? > > cheers > > Chaals > > -- > Charles McCathieNevile, Opera Software: Standards Group > hablo español - je parle français - jeg lærer norsk > chaals@opera.com Try Opera 9.1 http://opera.com
Received on Sunday, 25 February 2007 22:13:38 UTC