W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wai-ert@w3.org > February 2007

Re: Comments on mobileOK Basic draft

From: Johannes Koch <johannes.koch@fit.fraunhofer.de>
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 16:08:52 +0100
Message-ID: <45D32604.3090405@fit.fraunhofer.de>
To: public-wai-ert@w3.org

Carlos Iglesias schrieb:
> 2.3.3 HTTP Response
> "If an HTTP request fails for any reason during a test (network-level error, DNS resolution error, non-HTTP response, or server returns an HTTP 4xx or 5xx status), the test outcome should be considered FAIL"
> Shouldn't be "Not tested" a more suitable value in this case?

An error page (HTTP 4xx or 5xx) should also be tested and it can PASS or 
FAIL the requirements of mobileOK.

> 2.3.5 Included resources
> In addition to Johannes' comment about list-style-images, what about .ico cursors (CSS cursor property)
> Any other CSS-referenceable resources?
> "If the response specifies an Internet media type that is not "text/css", "image/jpeg" or "image/gif", FAIL"
> What about image/png or application/svg+xml for example? Are they forbidden in a MOK Basic conformance?

They are not supported by the Default Delivery Context.

> Some CMS add lots of CR characters to the content.
> Shoud be CR characters added to the extraneous characters count?

Yes, they are whitespace.

> "If the value of the href attribute begins with the "javascript:" scheme, FAIL"
> I would say "If the value of the href attribute is not a valid URI..." to avoid href="#"/onclick or similar combinations.

What is a valid URI? Javascript-URIs can be perfectly valid.

> "If the document contains no input element whose name attribute's value matches that of this radio input..."
> No idea what does it mean.

Radio controls that form a group share the same name attribute. One 
radio control of a group must be checked as default.

Johannes Koch - Competence Center BIKA
Fraunhofer Institute for Applied Information Technology (FIT.LIFE)
Schloss Birlinghoven, D-53757 Sankt Augustin, Germany
Phone: +49-2241-142628    Fax: +49-2241-142065
Received on Wednesday, 14 February 2007 15:09:31 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:55:55 UTC