- From: Johannes Koch <johannes.koch@fit.fraunhofer.de>
- Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 15:20:20 +0200
- To: public-wai-ert@w3.org
Welcome back Shadi Abou-Zahra schrieb: > Thanks for reworking this, it looks good to me. One question though, the > http:Message class reminds me very much of the RFC 822 work that we have > dropped a while ago. I'm not arguing to revive this work (or namespace) Really? ;-) > but do you think we could clean it up to become an extension point? > > For example if we move http:body up into the http:Message and remodel > http:httpVersion (not sure how though) then the http:Message resembles > pretty much an rfc822:Message (and anyone who needs it can extend it). You mean something like: foo:Message |- 0..1 foo:headers |- 1 foo:body http:Message extends foo:Message |- 1 http:httpVersion |- 0..1 dc:date foo:headers ((Collection of) foo:MessageHeader) foo:body ((rdf:Alt of) foo:Content) with Content (with subclasses), MessageHeader, HeaderName, HeaderElement, Param and their properties moving to the foo namespace? -- Johannes Koch BIKA Web Compliance Center - Fraunhofer FIT Schloss Birlinghoven, D-53757 Sankt Augustin, Germany Phone: +49-2241-142628 Fax: +49-2241-142065
Received on Tuesday, 21 August 2007 13:20:29 UTC