- From: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 15:00:58 +0200
- To: Johannes Koch <johannes.koch@fit.fraunhofer.de>
- CC: public-wai-ert@w3.org
Hi Johannes, Thanks for reworking this, it looks good to me. One question though, the http:Message class reminds me very much of the RFC 822 work that we have dropped a while ago. I'm not arguing to revive this work (or namespace) but do you think we could clean it up to become an extension point? For example if we move http:body up into the http:Message and remodel http:httpVersion (not sure how though) then the http:Message resembles pretty much an rfc822:Message (and anyone who needs it can extend it). What do you think? Regards, Shadi Johannes Koch wrote: > Hi group, > > I did some small changes to the Revised simplified approach proposal > sent in mail > <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert/2007Jul/0009.html>. > > - names of properties with collections are in plural form > (http:requests, http:headers, http:headerElements, http:params) > - dc:date added to http:Message > -- Shadi Abou-Zahra Web Accessibility Specialist for Europe | Chair & Staff Contact for the Evaluation and Repair Tools WG | World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) http://www.w3.org/ | Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI), http://www.w3.org/WAI/ | WAI-TIES Project, http://www.w3.org/WAI/TIES/ | Evaluation and Repair Tools WG, http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/ | 2004, Route des Lucioles - 06560, Sophia-Antipolis - France | Voice: +33(0)4 92 38 50 64 Fax: +33(0)4 92 38 78 22 |
Received on Tuesday, 21 August 2007 13:01:01 UTC