content adaptation (was Re: Last Call Review: EARL 1.0 Schema Last Call Working Draft)

Hi Shuaib,

shuaib wrote:
> 4.    Since EARL is also supposed to provide reusable vocabulary for generic
> quality assurance and validation purposes. I was thinking that the results
> data gathered (in earl:Test Result) could be enriched and represented
> formally so as to be usable on the fly for software adaptation. For example
> the usability of the product can be dynamically adjusted based upon input
> usability tests and the corresponding results.

The usage of EARL for content adaptation purposes is certainly an
important aspect. However, can you please clarify what you mean by
enriching and formally representing the gathered data? It would be
helpful if you can point out specific issues with the schema as it
currently stands, or if you have specific suggestions on improvements.

Regards,
   Shadi


-- 
Shadi Abou-Zahra     Web Accessibility Specialist for Europe |
Chair & Staff Contact for the Evaluation and Repair Tools WG |
World Wide Web Consortium (W3C)           http://www.w3.org/ |
Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI),   http://www.w3.org/WAI/ |
WAI-TIES Project,                http://www.w3.org/WAI/TIES/ |
Evaluation and Repair Tools WG,    http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/ |
2004, Route des Lucioles - 06560,  Sophia-Antipolis - France |
Voice: +33(0)4 92 38 50 64          Fax: +33(0)4 92 38 78 22 |

Received on Sunday, 29 April 2007 08:29:46 UTC