W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wai-ert@w3.org > April 2007

Re: Last Call Review: EARL 1.0 Schema Last Call Working Draft

From: Johannes Koch <johannes.koch@fit.fraunhofer.de>
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 10:39:28 +0200
Message-ID: <462DC240.6000607@fit.fraunhofer.de>
To: shuaib <skarim@ifs.tuwien.ac.at>
Cc: public-wai-ert@w3.org

shuaib schrieb:
>> I think we already thought about adding time properties. The HTTP spec
>> talks about time in the section on caching. You could add e.g.
>> http://purl.org/dc/terms/created or refinements like
>> http://purl.org/dc/terms/dateSubmitted to the Request resources. Usually
>> the server already sends a Date header. But you could additionally add
>> your local date/time to the Response resource.
> 
> Here are you referring to HTTP Specs. RFC2616, or the HTTP RDF vocabulary
> under review?

The HTTP 1.1 spec (RFC 2616).

> I saw in RFC 2616 the caching mechanism but not the comparable
> details in HTTP RDF. Maybe I overlooked something.

No you didn't :-)

> In any case, shouldn't these properties be made part of HTTP RDF schema, or
> you are leaving it to the users to extend if they are in need of?

Group: This could be a topic for further discussion.

-- 
Johannes Koch
BIKA Web Compliance Center - Fraunhofer FIT
Schloss Birlinghoven, D-53757 Sankt Augustin, Germany
Phone: +49-2241-142628    Fax: +49-2241-142065
Received on Tuesday, 24 April 2007 08:40:38 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:18:28 GMT