W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wai-ert@w3.org > September 2006

Re: do we want to omit the confidence property?

From: Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 23:11:42 +0200
To: "Chris Ridpath" <chris.ridpath@utoronto.ca>, "Shadi Abou-Zahra" <shadi@w3.org>, public-wai-ert@w3.org
Message-ID: <op.tggc5secwxe0ny@widsith.local>

On Mon, 25 Sep 2006 15:53:19 +0200, Chris Ridpath  
<chris.ridpath@utoronto.ca> wrote:

> I think the confidence property should be in EARL and we should specify  
> what it means. We can use a 3 level scale (high, medium and low) or some  
> sort of numeric scale.

I think there is a reasonable arguent for keeping it in the spec and  
asking for datatyping of any Literal values. Ther is no interoperability  
and I do not believe that in a reasonable timeframe we have any hope of  
defining that, since it varies from test to test as well as from tester to  



   Charles McCathieNevile, Opera Software: Standards Group
   hablo español  -  je parle français  -  jeg lærer norsk
chaals@opera.com          Try Opera 9 now! http://opera.com
Received on Monday, 25 September 2006 21:12:08 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:55:54 UTC