Re: issues addressed (was Re: Updated EARL 1.0 Schema Editors' Draft)

Hi,

Carlos Iglesias wrote:
>> Johannes Koch wrote:
>>> Shadi Abou-Zahra wrote:
>>>> However, there are some advantages to describing foaf:Person 
>>>> separately because of its unique stability in relation to 
>> the other 
>>>> foaf:Agent sublcasses. There is also a question about making 
>>>> earl:Software a sublcass of foaf:Agent.
>>> I thought we already talked about that and suggested to make 
>>> earl:Software a subclass of foaf:Agent. But I may be wrong.
>> I don't remember that. Do you know approximately when this call was?
> 
> There was some "philosophical" discussion about a similar matter in the
> list [1] and in the minutes [2]
> To keep it short, and avoid the repetition of the philosophical
> discussion, I just say that I prefer not to do it for the same reasons
> explained in the previous discussion.
> 
> [1] - Thread at
> [http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert/2006Jun/0014.html]
> [2] - [http://www.w3.org/2006/06/28-er-minutes#item03]

This issue has been recorded in the issues list:
  <http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/EARL10/issues#software>

Regards,
  Shadi


-- 
Shadi Abou-Zahra     Web Accessibility Specialist for Europe | 
Chair & Staff Contact for the Evaluation and Repair Tools WG | 
World Wide Web Consortium (W3C)           http://www.w3.org/ | 
Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI),   http://www.w3.org/WAI/ | 
WAI-TIES Project,                http://www.w3.org/WAI/TIES/ | 
Evaluation and Repair Tools WG,    http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/ | 
2004, Route des Lucioles - 06560,  Sophia-Antipolis - France | 
Voice: +33(0)4 92 38 50 64          Fax: +33(0)4 92 38 78 22 | 

Received on Tuesday, 19 September 2006 14:07:43 UTC