W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wai-ert@w3.org > September 2006

Re: Updated EARL 1.0 Schema Editors' Draft

From: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 20:19:47 +0200
Message-ID: <4505A8C3.1000606@w3.org>
To: public-wai-ert@w3.org

Oh yes, a tricky one. I've added the following for now:

earl:lineCharLen - "The integer values (counters) *must* start with the value "0" to denote the first position."

earl:charSnippet - "The integer values (offsets) *must* start with the value "0" to denote the first position."

earl:byteSnippet - "The integer values (offsets) *must* start with the value "0" to denote the first position."

I'm sure we can tweak the wording a little more but are there objections to start counting at 0 for these values?


Regards,
  Shadi


Johannes Koch wrote:
> 
> Shadi Abou-Zahra wrote:
>> Ref: <http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/EARL10/WD-EARL10-Schema-20060905>
> 
> For interoparability reasons we have to decide whether counting starts 
> with 0 or 1 in length or position properties like earl:line.

-- 
Shadi Abou-Zahra     Web Accessibility Specialist for Europe | 
Chair & Staff Contact for the Evaluation and Repair Tools WG | 
World Wide Web Consortium (W3C)           http://www.w3.org/ | 
Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI),   http://www.w3.org/WAI/ | 
WAI-TIES Project,                http://www.w3.org/WAI/TIES/ | 
Evaluation and Repair Tools WG,    http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/ | 
2004, Route des Lucioles - 06560,  Sophia-Antipolis - France | 
Voice: +33(0)4 92 38 50 64          Fax: +33(0)4 92 38 78 22 | 
Received on Monday, 11 September 2006 18:19:56 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:18:27 GMT