Hi Charles, Charles McCathieNevile wrote: > ... >> >> It could be used in HTTP in RDF and elsewhere. > > What is the use case? In fact, Johannes and I want to break a W3C Note-writing record, and we could not think of something else :-) Seriously, I think that we are not consistent if we have on one side an earl:uri property for things like WebContent, and on the other hand, we have all the possibilities to decompose a URI in the HTTP in RDF when using the http:GetRequest, for instance. With that URI class and its properties, we may have a consistent way of expressing *any URI*, with the different schemes, and reuse it in the HTTP note. But maybe, it is only me who starts to have fun with namespaces ... regards, carlos -- Dr Carlos A Velasco - http://access.fit.fraunhofer.de/ Fraunhofer-Institut für Angewandte Informationstechnik FIT [Fraunhofer Institute for Applied Information Technology (FIT)] Barrierefreie Informations- und Kommunikationstechnologie für Alle Schloss Birlinghoven, D53757 Sankt Augustin (Germany) Tel: +49-2241-142609 Fax: +49-2241-1442609Received on Thursday, 23 March 2006 20:14:13 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:18:26 GMT